Kaplan Fox seeks declaratory, injunctive and monetary relief related to Bayer’s practice of claiming “heart health,” “immunity support” and “energy” benefits related to its line of One A Day vitamin supplements. The amended class complaint alleges that these claims are unsupported by science and mislead consumers as to the actual benefits of these products. On March 10, 2015, the Northern District of California denied in part Bayer’s motion to dismiss, allowing the case to proceed.

Case

Gallagher, et al. v. Bayer AG, et al., No. 3:14-cv-04601-WHO

Court

Northern District of California

Class

All persons in the United States who purchased Bayer One A Day supplements that contained one or more claims of heart, immunity or energy benefits

Attorneys

• Robert N. Kaplan
• Laurence D. King
• Linda M. Fong
• Lauren I. Dubick

Case Documents

• Amended Class Action Complaint
• Order Denying Motion to Dismiss